Thenursinghub prides itself on its specialization in the all academic fields. This focus sets them apart as a writing company that fully comprehends the intricacies and challenges faced by students. Their team comprises skilled writers who possess not only advanced degrees but also practical experience in the industry. This expertise allows them to craft papers that reflect a deep understanding of nursing concepts, procedures, and standards. The company follows stringent quality assurance measures to ensure that all papers meet the highest academic standards. Each paper undergoes a thorough review process, which includes rigorous proofreading, editing, and plagiarism checks. By prioritizing quality, Thenursinghub ensures that nursing students receive well-researched, accurately cited, and flawlessly written papers.
Choose ONE of the following questions to answer in the Discussion Board:
Make sure to read what others have written and comment on at least one other student’s response. You may access the Discussion Board by selecting the Discussion Board link in the course menu on the left.
answer to
The Bill of Rights was intended to protect certain fundamental rights for all citizens against actions of the national government. Should the U.S. Constitution provide the same protections for all citizens against actions of state governments, or should it be up to each state whether to protect fundamental rights for citizens within the state?
The U.S Constitution should provide the same protection for all citizens. Every state should be governed accordingly but when it comes to basic human rights it should be one standard across the board. Like the Bill of Rights has the 10 amendments to ensure all of human rights are not defined by the national government the constitution should ensure those same rights. Allowing the states to form their own opinions and laws of the people are opening up doors to discrimination, racism and a lot more, setting us back many years. Having a set of laws that are equal in every way for every person in any state, will put proof behind our slogan”The Land of the Free”
Choose ONE of the following questions to answer in the Discussion Board:
Make sure to read what others have written and comment on at least one other student’s response. You may access the Discussion Board by selecting the Discussion Board link in the course menu on the left.
ANSWER TO Damaris Balarezo
Discussion 2 – Question 3
I believe that pork-barrel legislation in a necessary evil in the world of politics. If the federal government makes funds available to each state and district, political representatives should secure those funds for their districts. It’s no secret that politicians sometimes use their influence for their own personal gain, so why not use it to improve the lives of their constituents and/or their hometowns. I think that as long there is a genuine need for the funds and those funds are used appropriately then, in today’s political climate, representatives must do whatever necessary to meet the needs of those they represent. My opinion wouldn’t change if the area in question were my own hometown or one that I’ve never heard of 5,000 miles away.
Discussion 3 ![]() |
Choose ONE of the following questions to answer in the Discussion Board:
Make sure to read what others have written and comment on at least one other student’s response. answer to I believe the President should have ultimate power and veto ability because he was elected as a majority winner. I also believe that they should be advocating and coming up with various ideas so the President has a perspective of more than just one person for all of America. Now you also have to think that it is extremely hard for a President to keep up with everything that goes on with the government so personally I think that if the President has faith in the cabinet appointees that they should have more freedom to help him control the government. After all the president did make and suggest his own cabinet. |
---|
Discussion 4 ![]() |
Choose ONE of the following questions to answer in the Discussion Board:
Make sure to read what others have written and comment on at least one other student’s response. answer to
No, I don’t believe that the supreme court views should play a role in the endorsement by Senate because the supreme court is supposed to be basing all cases by the evidence that was presented to the courts. If the judgment was based on a person political views it is a violation of their right. |
---|
Discussion 5 ![]() |
Choose ONE of the following questions to answer in the Discussion Board:
Make sure to read what others have written and comment on at least one other student’s response. answer to Discussion 5,Q:4 Question:4 I do agree that college and university should be able to promote racial diversity through the admission process. We live in a very diverse world, colleges and university is where our future leaders and professionals go to attain a higher education. I couldn’t image a university where only one race was allowed to attend. It would have a tremendous impact on our country socially, financially and academically on our higher learning Institutions. University board members and Chancellors have a moral and ethical responsibility to maintain a racial diversity policy for higher learning Institutions. Leaders not abiding by a diversity policy for his/her institutions would only create a social and ethical division in our county. We as Americans are at our best when we come together as country. Learning with people from a variety of backgrounds encourages collaboration and fosters education growth that will benefit all students and society. |
---|
Discussion 6 ![]() |
Choose ONE of the following questions to answer in the Discussion Board:
Make sure to read what others have written and comment on at least one other student’s response. answer to I do believe in the bandwagon effect and it not only affects politics. People usually want to support a winner. I’m from San Antonio so I support the Spurs; the second they make the playoffs I am a diehard fan. You wouldn’t know I didn’t follow them the whole season. The same goes for politics. Some people will not do any research on the candidate or the issues, they will vote for the “leader†merely because they have the majority vote. They assume he must be the better choice since everyone else is voting for him. |
---|
Discussion 7 ![]() |
Choose ONE of the following questions to answer in the Discussion Board:
Make sure to read what others have written and comment on at least one other student’s response. answer to Discussion 7 Should voting be restricted to those with a college education? Why or why not? I do not believe that voting should be restricted to those with a college education, per se, but voters should be well informed and aware of the important issues surrounding the election. Dautrich (2016) states that “Voting for the sake of voting may not produce good choices†(381). Some citizens invest time in becoming informed voters, and some vote just to wear the little sticker that says “I Votedâ€. Others have no real interest in voting, and just want to get it out of the way. Although having a college education can’t hurt, it is not absolutely necessary for an individual to cast an informed, meaningful vote. Having the right to vote does not require a college education, so voting should not be restricted. I believe that it would be unfair to the individuals who have been casting meaningful votes for years. It would be great if more voters put the time and energy into learning about the issues prior to voting or deciding not to vote, but they have the right to make these choices. Dautrich, K., and Yalof, D., The Enduring Democracy, Custom 4th Edition, 2016, Cengage Learning. |
---|
Discussion 8 ![]() |
Choose ONE of the following questions to answer in the Discussion Board:
Make sure to read what others have written and comment on at least one other student’s response. answer to Discussion 8 I believe that progressive taxes, which increase with income, are unfair because they continue to increase as the income amounts increases. So, if a person is working 40 hours a week and barely making ends meet, receiving a pay raise would not be very effective, because the person will be paying higher taxes. Regressive taxes are also unfair, because they charge each individual the same amount, regardless of income. So those earning a significantly low income are paying high taxes, while wealthier people are not effected as much. Flat taxes seem fair because, as Dautrich and Yalof (2016) state, the tax burden would be “spread more evenly…[and] Americans would not be penalized for working harder to earn more†(438). With flat taxes, money is coming from all entities at the same proportion; thus, the rich pay more taxes than the poor, but the percentage of taxes they both are charged is equal. Dautrich, K., and Yalof, D., The Enduring Democracy, Custom 4th Edition, 2016, Cengage Learning. |
---|
Thenursinghub delivers custom papers tailored to the unique requirements of each student. Their writers collaborate closely with clients to understand their specific needs, instructions, and preferences. This individualized approach allows Thenursinghub to produce original content that aligns perfectly with the student’s academic goals, ensuring the work is both relevant and authentic.