An important guideline for research scientific article is the formation of clear restrictive principles and criteria. Without them, the fundamental specificity of the scientific method is lost, the value and applicability of the results obtained are reduced or completely lost.
Every professional scientist should have an understanding of the concept and benefits of the limitations of qualitative research methods. Moreover, the requirements for published materials in authoritative international publications necessarily include a corresponding section – Limitations (limitations in scientific research).
To do this, the author needs to understand what exactly is embeds in this concept. To understand the requirements of scientific journals and learn how to independently write an article for international publication.
Research limitations are a clear limitation of the possibilities of using the selected research methods, characteristics of the research objects, the unambiguity of the context, the boundaries of the considered subject of the experiment.
Concentration on the qualitative and quantitative indicators of the phenomenon under study makes it possible to declare the scientific nature of the results obtained. In addition to the criterion of subject limits, ethical and sociocultural prohibitions are also considered important guidelines and limitations of scientific research.
The study of any phenomenon from the point of view of science is based on a strictly formulated methodology. The word “method” itself can be translated from ancient Greek as “way”, “road”. And in order to “follow it” to the final point, that is, to get a specific result – new knowledge, one must not deviate, leave the methodological “rut”.
The limitations of research methods can be considered the main advantage of the scientific way of studying various phenomena. By clearly defining the subject area, the area of applicability of the methods, as well as setting the unambiguity of concepts and categories, the researcher forms an accessible toolkit for the effective achievement of the goals.
Any sociological experiment can serve as an example to understand the phenomenon of limiting research. It necessarily limits the studied social groups, the range of problems studied, the quantitative and qualitative parameters of the audience, the categories of society to which conclusions can be extrapolated, etc. In the exact sciences, even stricter theoretical and experimental frameworks are established.
For the correct formation of restrictive criteria in a published work, a scientist must know the types of restrictions. These include:
Modern science is closely intertwined with the issues of social responsibility and ethics. The most common examples of ethical constraints are:
Here’s an example that combines different types of restrictive premises:
“When studying the educational preferences of students studying at the universities of the Stavropol Territory and professing Islam, 1,500 questionnaires were assessed, which is a sufficient reference sample”.
Highlighted here as restrictions:
The more limiting parameters are highlighted, the more substantive and meaningful the results of research work become.