Multi-year Budget Evaluation

Multi-year Budget Evaluation

 

This assignment is the second of a three-part process. Part III will be completed in Unit VIII.

 

Using the selected government budget from Part I in the previous unit, evaluate the past three years’ allocation of public goods. Develop an analysis including the following:

 

 Evaluate goals and priorities of the local government goods and services.  Assess internal and external challenges for providing goods and services.  Evaluate budget stabilization measures.  Provide recommendations.

 

Your report should consist of no less than two pages, and all sources utilized should be cited and referenced using APA style. Please ensure that you include a cover page and reference page. Remember that the cover page and reference page are not included in the page expectation.

  • Running head: BUDGET EVALUATION 1

    Budget Evaluation for City Council of Columbia

    Oril Demas

    Columbia Southern University

    BUDGET EVALUATION 2

    Budget Evaluation for City Council of Columbia

    Introduction

    The financial transactions by the City Council of Columbia are handled by the Finance

    Department. The intention of municipal budgeting is to enable the management and the elected

    officials access appropriate financial information and recommendations on the important projects

    that require immediate attention. Further still, the budget ensures that the council’s operations are

    as much as transparent as possible. Most of the mandatory expenses are the recurring

    expenditure, debt services, capital projects, and annual strategic plans. Despite having the

    mandatory expenses, the municipal must prioritize public goods and services. Public goods are

    commodities provided to the public by the government without intentions of making profit the

    most important public goods receive larger financial allocations. This essay focuses on

    prioritized public goods and services by the previous budgets of the City Council of Columbia.

    The analysis shall focus on the 2017/2018, 2016/2018, and 2015/2016 budget allocations.

    Goals and Priorities of the Local Government Goods and Services

    In the 2015/2016 budgetary allocations, several ongoing projects were under the office of

    the city manager. The office was to facilitate the revitalization of housing projects in that had

    been started in East Columbia. The Columbian clean water vision 2020 was also apriority in the

    budget (“Budget in Brief”). Infrastructure developments were also to be implemented in the

    downtown businesses, mainly in the Columbia Main Street. Some of the programs aimed at

    supporting the council’s employees; for instance, a wellness program was to be introduced to

    encourage healthy behavior among employees. The budgetary allocations for community

    development was approximately $1, 098, 373

    Commented [CS1]: Important information about how to properly format papers is included in the following tutorial: http://columbiasouthern.adobeconnect.com/formattingformalassig nments/

    Commented [CS2]: Review level heading rules: http://columbiasouthern.adobeconnect.com/levelheadings/

    Commented [CS3]: This will change when the reference entry is corrected.

    BUDGET EVALUATION 3

    In 2016/2017 approximately $63,644,467 was allocated to police and fire departments to

    boost security services in the city, the next major service allocation was the public works and

    recreation that received approximately $30,000,000, while the recurrent government expenses

    were approximately $18,594,951. The priority is on the safety of properties and security of the

    City of Columbia (“Budget in Brief”).

    In 2017/2018 financial year, the fire, the police, and the council’s administration

    expenses were still the major expenses. However, the expenses allocated for the improvement of

    parks and recreation facilities had increased.

    Challenges for the Provision of Goods and Services

    Internal challenges are major hindrances in the provision of goods and services to the

    general public. They are sometimes caused by the council’s structures or the management. First,

    the bureaucratic structure of the council hinders quick decision making. There are several offices

    that need to be consulted before the final decision is made; thus, quick services urgently needed

    by the public and were not preplanned cannot be provided. In addition, political interests of the

    councilors hinder proper services and goods delivery. The policies passed are in the interest of

    the party rather than those of the electorates. Finally, financial limitations also hinder service

    delivery. The council faces challenges in collecting revenues and taxes from public businesses

    within its jurisdiction.

    External challenges include hierarchical intergovernmental relations. There are several

    governments in the City of Columbia which include the federal government, the state

    government, and the local government. Sometimes, council government faces frustration from

    the senior government; thus, hindering its operations. Furthermore, mistrust between private

    Commented [CS4]: A run-on occurs when there is insufficient punctuation to connect two independent clauses (sentences that can

    stand on their own). There are three ways to correct the error.

    1. Create two separate sentences by using a period and capitalizing

    the first word of the second sentence

    2. Place a semicolon between the two main clauses

    3. Place a comma followed by a coordinating conjunction (for, and,

    nor, but, or, yet, so) between the two main clauses

    I recommend the following tutorial:

    http://columbiasouthern.adobeconnect.com/runons/

    Commented [CS5]: Where are the citations for information? Citations are needed every 2-4 sentences even when the source remains the same.

    BUDGET EVALUATION 4

    sector and public sector is one of the major hindrances of service delivery in the local

    government level.

    Budget Stabilization Measures

    Budget stabilization measures are important for any budgetary allocations because they

    help in reducing expenditure and increasing income to fill the budget pitfalls. They intend to

    supplement budgets during financial deficit. Some of the measures include the allocation of

    surplus more for use in the future date or just allocation of the budget stabilization reserve fund

    (BSF). However, the budget of City Council of Columbia lacks proper stabilization measures.

    Recommendations

    Even though the budget focuses on basic needs such as security and fire protection, the

    council tends to focus more on recurrent expenditure. It also needs to establish development

    projects for the public. In addition, the budget lacks proper stabilization measures. The council

    needs to introduce measures of ensuring that budgetary surplus is available during emergencies.

    BUDGET EVALUATION 5

    Reference

    “Budget in Brief”. City of Columbia Retrieved on August 14, 2018 from

    https://columbiasc.gov/depts/budget-office/glance_2016-_10-2016_6.pdf

    I suggest using the above format. Columbia South Carolina Office of Budget and Program

    Management is the author.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.